Application & credential screen
Résumé, JD, active bar status, and engagement history reviewed against what the work requires.
Every reviewer on a matter has cleared the same screening and is matched to the work by tracked performance — not pulled from a list. Whether we're running under your brand or on your matter directly, here's how we build a team you can defend.
Résumé, JD, active bar status, and engagement history reviewed against what the work requires.
Screened against the active client roster before any assignment.
Before a reviewer joins a matter, we confirm they have the specific skills it calls for — subject matter, review type, and language.
We track each reviewer's accuracy and calibration by project type and subject matter, and organize them into talent pools by demonstrated strength. When a matter comes in, we match the reviewers whose tracked performance fits it — and reviewers who fall below the bar come off the work.
The result is a pool that's curated, not just assembled. The reviewers who performed on your last matter come back for the next one — institutional knowledge redeployed, not rebuilt with strangers.
Every reviewer on a multilingual matter is screened against a representative document set in their language before they're deployed.
Every document gets a full review pass plus sample-based QC layers. Sampling depth adjusts per matter and sensitivity.
Tell us about the matter — size, languages, timeline — and a delivery lead who has spent 25+ years building these teams comes back with a staffing plan and a quote.